Episode 10

full
Published on:

12th Aug 2025

EP 10 Like, So Dramatic

Episode 10 — Like, So Dramatic

Podcast: The Judgmental Podcast with Hugh & Christine

Theme: Judicial accountability, courtroom drama, and the politics of family court.

Episode Overview

In this candid conversation, Hugh and Christine pull back the curtain on the Louisville legal scene — from judges mentioning them in court to attorneys using TikTok posts as courtroom ammunition. They dissect recent courtroom encounters, questionable judicial rulings, and how strategy can make or break a case. The duo also reacts to viral courtroom clips, calls out systemic flaws, and examines the influence of money on court-ordered programs.

Key Topics & Segments

•          When TikToks Make It Into the Court Record

o          Christine shares stories of being name-dropped by judges, parenting coordinators, and

attorneys during active cases.

o          How social media comments get twisted into legal leverage.

•          The Alison Russell Controversy

o          Accusations linking Judgey.com to Project 2025.

o          Political labeling as a tactic to divide and discredit.

•          Inside the Louisville Courthouse

o          Positive feedback from attorneys and court staff versus calculated backlash.

o          The surprising neutrality of Judgy despite local assumptions.

•          Viral

Courtroom Clip Breakdown

o          A probation revocation hearing turns tense as a judge lectures a defense attorney.

o          Discussion of judicial demeanor, gender dynamics, and strategic advocacy in court.

•          Judge Jessica Stone’s Facebook Post

o          Why labeling critics “cartoons and media” misses the point.

o          Concerns about fundamental gaps in legal understanding on the bench.

•          When Judges Don’t Understand Business Income

o          Misinterpretations of gross vs. net income in high-asset divorces.

o          How this lack of financial literacy affects child support and maintenance rulings.

•          The Receivership Case That Went Nowhere

o          A cautionary tale about marital business assets being destroyed because a judge didn’t act.

•          Court-Ordered Programs & the Money Trail

o          Families in

Transition, Batterers Intervention, and DUI programs: do they work or just generate revenue?

o          The parallels to the troubled teen industry and privatized incarceration.

Key Takeaways

•          Public criticism of judges often provokes defensive — and sometimes revealing —

responses.

•          Courtroom strategy is as important as legal knowledge, especially when judges are

inconsistent in enforcing rules.

•          Political and financial interests can shape court-ordered programs more than actual

outcomes for families.

•          Transparency, education, and genuine accountability are essential to repairing trust in the judicial system.

Perfect For Listeners Who

•          Are passionate about judicial reform and court transparency.

•          Want to understand the behind-the-scenes realities of practicing law.

•          Follow true courtroom drama and legal commentary.

•          Enjoy candid, unfiltered takes from experienced attorneys.

Episode Links & Resources

•          Judgy.com – Platform for reviewing judges

•          Follow Christine on TikTok & Instagram: @KentuckyChristine

•          Subscribe on: YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, iHeartRadio

Transcript
Speaker:

You are listening to

The Judgemental Podcast.

2

:

We're Hugh and Christine, the Minds

Behind Judgy, the revolutionary app

3

:

that empowers you to judge the judges.

4

:

It's pastime for judicial accountability

and transparency within the courts.

5

:

Prepare for sharp insights, candid

critiques, and unshakable honesty from

6

:

two lawyers determined to save the system.

7

:

We need some justice.

8

:

Justice, my fine justice.

9

:

And I wanna ring, be in public.

10

:

I wanna ring, be in public crowd.

11

:

Yeah.

12

:

Christine: All right.

13

:

Welcome to the Judgmental Podcast.

14

:

We're gonna start off today talking about

how many times we have been mentioned

15

:

by the local Louisville litigators.

16

:

Actually, one judge did a Facebook post

about us calling us cartoons and media.

17

:

But to back up just a little bit, I

started this, my goodness, I think it's

18

:

almost been a year and a half, but my

tiktoks, I'm at @KentuckyChristine have

19

:

been used as a part of the court record

on at least two or three occasions,

20

:

and I've been mentioned by name.

21

:

Did you know that?

22

:

Hugh: No.

23

:

I mean, I, I heard I've, I've heard

about one or two of the instances,

24

:

but I didn't know that many times.

25

:

Yeah.

26

:

So when in pleadings Oh.

27

:

Or are spoken about on the record?

28

:

Recorded in cases

29

:

Christine: d all of the above.

30

:

Hugh: Wow.

31

:

Christine: So, yeah, when I first started,

I had a follower that asked a question,

32

:

and this was a Bullitt county attorney,

Carrie Risin, I, what's her last name?

33

:

Oh,

34

:

Hugh: Ritsert.

35

:

Ritsert,

36

:

Christine: Yeah.

37

:

Mm-hmm.

38

:

She made it a part of an

exhibit on a pleading.

39

:

Oh,

40

:

and then we, of course, we had

Elizabeth Jenkins, who was a parenting

41

:

coordinator who mentioned me on the

record and was like your Honor, in front

42

:

of Christian Ward, your Honor, this

pro se litigant that she's an hourly

43

:

parenting coordinator on contacted Ms.

44

:

Christina Miller.

45

:

And I was like, yeah.

46

:

And the judge was like, Hmm.

47

:

So just the notion to utilize me,

she'd asked like a very benign comment,

48

:

just like a very benign question, kind

of just like, what is the procedure

49

:

about FOCs or GS or something?

50

:

Well

51

:

Well ask

52

:

Hugh: it publicly.

53

:

Or she talked to you privately

and then told the told.

54

:

Christine: She

55

:

didn't call me attorney.

56

:

No.

57

:

She said she'd called me and it's like,

I don't, you can't call people on TikTok.

58

:

She had commented on one of

my posts talking about these

59

:

third party appointments that

obviously everyone knows.

60

:

And

61

:

And so

62

:

Hugh: this attorney saw

it and mentioned it.

63

:

Christine: Yep.

64

:

And mentioned it to get an advantage to

be like, oh, she's talking to Christine.

65

:

Hugh: Christina.

66

:

Christine: Yeah, yeah, yeah.

67

:

Hugh: Christina.

68

:

Christine: And I'll tell you,

Elizabeth Jenkins and I have history.

69

:

I was like, when it happened,

I did a TikTok on it.

70

:

I had not spoken to her

in probably a year now.

71

:

Of course, I texted her after and

she's like, I don't want any problems.

72

:

I don't want any problems.

73

:

And it was just like, well,

that's the whole thing.

74

:

And that goes into the other

attorney that mentioned us by name.

75

:

Remember that happened last week?

76

:

I did a post on it, Ms.

77

:

Allison Russell.

78

:

But that just goes, don't remember

79

:

Hugh: anything about it.

80

:

Christine: Oh, really?

81

:

No, I'm

82

:

Hugh: kidding.

83

:

Christine: Oh my gosh.

84

:

This one is like so dramatic

in so many different ways.

85

:

But it just goes to show how attorneys

will utilize anyone questioning the system

86

:

as a means to , get an advantage in court.

87

:

Do you know what I'm saying?

88

:

Hugh: Yeah.

89

:

I mean, it's, I was a

little bit shocked by it.

90

:

Yeah.

91

:

But yeah,

92

:

Christine: and then we had Jim Murphy,

the GAL we've talked about that apparently

93

:

allegedly went up to a pro se litigator

and said that I was dangerous.

94

:

And this pro se litigator put that

in the record, which this is a person

95

:

fighting about their child or children.

96

:

Again, I don't know these, like

I don't represent these people.

97

:

I literally make tiktoks and talk

about, Hey, you need to look into

98

:

who's donating to your judge.

99

:

You need to be careful when you get

an FOC or GAL or parenting coordinator

100

:

appointment because it could cost

you tens of thousands of dollars.

101

:

And oftentimes here in Louisville, we

have problems with meeting with the kids.

102

:

Hugh: Yeah.

103

:

Christine: And I don't

think that's a radical.

104

:

Hugh: So to be clear though, you

never actually talked to any of

105

:

these people that allegedly had, had

dealings with you or had posted to

106

:

you or commented on your tiktoks?

107

:

Christine: Well, I don't wanna ever like

for sure say my sources, but no, for when

108

:

that happened, I'd had a person comment

on my TikTok and I did a response to it.

109

:

And I don't think, I mean, certainly

I don't give out my cell phone.

110

:

Like you, I have some

people that I talk to.

111

:

I have sources and things like that,

but if , I get messages, oh my goodness.

112

:

I'd spend all day on the phone.

113

:

We'd never work.

114

:

Hugh: No, I, I, I understand.

115

:

Christine: Yeah.

116

:

And I did have

117

:

somebody come up to me in court and be

like, I'm a huge fan of yours and what

118

:

you're doing, but I just think , it's

the notion that they're utilizing

119

:

me or judgey to say negative things.

120

:

Isn't it so shocking?

121

:

Hugh: I expected there to be a lot

more backlash, really, to be honest.

122

:

Yeah.

123

:

I mean, when we go down.

124

:

Around the courthouse, we

run into people and it's just

125

:

been overwhelmingly positive.

126

:

Mm-hmm.

127

:

And how many, how many people have reached

out and said, well, when I finished this

128

:

or that case, you know, maybe we can talk,

I'd like to, like to come on and talk with

129

:

you guys and how many people say thank you

for saying what we all wish we could say.

130

:

July 29 Cam HW: Yep.

131

:

Yep.

132

:

And

133

:

Hugh: we, you know, this is what

we all talk about in, in groups

134

:

and in chats and, you know, when

we're having beers together.

135

:

But no one can come out and say it.

136

:

Thank you.

137

:

And I was really expecting that.

138

:

I mean, when you, when you buck any

system, the system usually fights back.

139

:

Pretty hard and I'm, I'm happy that almost

everything has been positive so far.

140

:

Christine: Oh yeah.

141

:

I think the lawyers are sick of it.

142

:

I mean, I think most of the, I talk to a

lot of lawyers but most people that are

143

:

saying anything negative or mentioning

us in pleadings are attaching tiktoks

144

:

as exhibits, which in and of itself is

just a stupid sentence to say out loud.

145

:

Most of the time they're court appointed

attorneys that are getting, you know,

146

:

appointments for GALs FOCs, parenting

coordinators, mediators, other than

147

:

our little Bullock County baby doll.

148

:

But again, we appreciate it.

149

:

Carrie, I will send you this link.

150

:

And so, Allison Russell,

let's talk about this.

151

:

'cause I do think this one maybe

upset you a little bit, not upset you.

152

:

What's the right way to say it?

153

:

Hugh: I don't, I don't know.

154

:

I didn't have that take on it.

155

:

I was, I was just a little surprised.

156

:

Yeah, I was, I was surprised.

157

:

Just by the nature of the comment,

and it made me feel old because I had

158

:

to ask you to translate the emojis.

159

:

Christine: LOL Oh my gosh.

160

:

There was an eye roll.

161

:

. Emoji.

162

:

I thought

163

:

Hugh: that's what it was.

164

:

But I had to check before I, I I reserve

judgment on the, the post until you

165

:

confirmed that that was an eye roll.

166

:

Christine: Well, and it's

just one of those things.

167

:

And Alison Russell is a court

appointed GAL in cases, and she

168

:

does a lot of appellate part work.

169

:

She's run for judge before,

but she made this assumption or

170

:

allegation that judgey judge y.com

171

:

is somehow associated with Project 2025.

172

:

That

173

:

Hugh: did upset me.

174

:

Yeah.

175

:

Only because of, yeah, I to be

mentioned in the same paragraph as

176

:

project 2025 was, extremely annoying.

177

:

I will say that.

178

:

Christine: And it's absurd.

179

:

And she knows it's absurd.

180

:

And I went on TikTok and

said, this is absurd.

181

:

You know, it's absurd.

182

:

We welcomed her on the podcast.

183

:

Sure.

184

:

Sent her a really nice message.

185

:

We'll talk about anything you want.

186

:

It'll be a civil conversation.

187

:

But I do think it's weird.

188

:

So I notice this.

189

:

And now just to be clear, judgy is

very separate from me and you, right?

190

:

Yes.

191

:

And judgy is neutral.

192

:

We are creating judgy to judge

the judges like we wear the

193

:

merch, like judgy think you want.

194

:

But it's not the notion, like

what I think about judges is

195

:

not what judges is gonna think.

196

:

Hugh: No.

197

:

Christine: You know, and what I think

about judges, you may not agree with

198

:

Hugh: me.

199

:

No, we don't agree on a lot of things.

200

:

Christine: Right.

201

:

But we certainly aren't politically

aligned in any sort of radical right

202

:

wing or radical left wing, anything.

203

:

I mean, the notion to

try to lump us into that.

204

:

Is to divide us and to make us

divisive and to make us controversial

205

:

and to keep y'all from listening

'cause they think you're stupid.

206

:

They think that the general public is

going to do whatever the local Louisville

207

:

lawyers that get appointed and what

the local Louisville judges want.

208

:

Hugh: Sure.

209

:

I mean, one of the things that was

most frustrating with me and my

210

:

practice was the way that the court

appointed, I wanna say system, it's,

211

:

it's attorneys and other individuals

that are part of court appointed.

212

:

They referred to it as the way we do it.

213

:

Yeah.

214

:

And this sort of, there's this factory,

the system of processing cases.

215

:

And I knew that there would

be some protection of that in

216

:

reaction to what we're doing.

217

:

I just, I found it strange to

be, compared to project:

218

:

I honestly don't get the reference

even as a slight, I don't understand.

219

:

I,

220

:

Christine: yeah, I noticed this when I

ran for office and that's kind of what

221

:

really changed my trajectory and kind of

how I, not aligned politically, but just

222

:

how I see politics because everybody came

out and painted me something that was

223

:

completely opposite of what I was and the

person I was running against, I knew her

224

:

political leanings and she was portrayed

as this completely different ideology than

225

:

what I knew her to be behind closed doors.

226

:

So I think it's a weapon, like if you

were to just utilize my name with, I'm

227

:

trying to think of someone controversial

on the right and the left, like.

228

:

If you utilize my name with either

one of those people you can just

229

:

completely alienate an entire audience.

230

:

Hugh: Yeah, that makes sense.

231

:

Christine: That's the goal.

232

:

Like the goal is to make people think

we are either one way or the other.

233

:

And you know, I would say

we're probably as neutral.

234

:

I know judges is neutral, but when it

comes to judges, it's a nonpartisan issue.

235

:

Sorry, I ramble.

236

:

No,

237

:

Hugh: Yeah, it's a nonpartisan issue.

238

:

Absolutely is.

239

:

Christine: I mean, I would say most of

these judges probably lean towards the

240

:

left and yet they violate due process.

241

:

Like,

242

:

Hugh: oh, I don't know about that.

243

:

Oh, interesting.

244

:

Tell me more.

245

:

Well, just in cases of religion, I mean,

one of the, one of the things that I

246

:

had to talk to my clients about where

in, in so many cases where the religious

247

:

leanings and when it comes into school

choice, if you're looking at Catholic

248

:

schools versus a Christian school versus,

and while that in Kentucky law at least.

249

:

Private school, unless the child has

some sort of special need, should not

250

:

be something that a judge is deciding.

251

:

But we knew that religious

affiliation, religious beliefs

252

:

are gonna play into it and they're

always going to, judges are humans.

253

:

Mm-hmm.

254

:

We are not asking computers to judge

our cases, but as a practitioner,

255

:

your clients need to understand that.

256

:

And the political leanings, I mean,

there were same gendered issues that I

257

:

knew if we ended up, I mean, especially

early on with same gender divorce.

258

:

Yeah.

259

:

When you had the spouses living

in separate counties, big part of

260

:

the decision was where you filed

and what the leanings were of that

261

:

judge because it was something new.

262

:

And it was thanks to what's her

name, Davis, the woman who wouldn't.

263

:

Kim Davis.

264

:

Kim Davis, yep.

265

:

Thanks.

266

:

Thanks to her.

267

:

It was politicized from

the very beginning.

268

:

July 29 Cam HW: Yeah.

269

:

Hugh: And I mean, so I, I

think that we had to really.

270

:

Do our due diligence on the judges

and, and advise our clients on it.

271

:

And I, I didn't find them

to be one way or the other.

272

:

It was a very mixed bag.

273

:

Especially when you got

outside of Louisville.

274

:

Christine: Well, I guess

I would say, oh, for sure.

275

:

Outside of Louisville, you

know, I used to practice,

276

:

Hugh: I know

277

:

Christine: in Morehead.

278

:

Oh, I know.

279

:

That's where Kim Davis was.

280

:

But

281

:

Hugh: I, when I think of the Louisville

area, I include the other counties that

282

:

most Louisville attorneys practice.

283

:

You know, the Shelby Spencer okay.

284

:

Samuel Anderson Oldham

Trim, you know that.

285

:

That's one circuit.

286

:

Then the Trimble Henry

Oldham, and then bullet.

287

:

That's, that's pretty much it.

288

:

But I mean, that's, that's sort of

the Louisville metropolitan area

289

:

that, that people practice in.

290

:

So I, I was,

291

:

Christine: see people from

here definitely don't do that.

292

:

Like, I don't even know, I grew

up in Bullock County and from the

293

:

south end of Louisville, but I don't

know that I'd ever been to Anderson

294

:

County until I was a litigator.

295

:

Like why would you go to, I mean, no

offense, maybe, I don't even know what's

296

:

in Anderson County, but people, when I'm

say I'm like, I predominantly it's wrong.

297

:

I need to stop.

298

:

But when I say like our local

judges, I mean Louisville.

299

:

Okay.

300

:

But yeah, I would say that definitely

like our Bullock County judges,

301

:

no, they are not liberal leaning.

302

:

Hugh: I mean, I, I.

303

:

I don't know at the moment, honestly, I

just, I, I remember there were certain

304

:

issues that you could research and,

and thanks to social media and people

305

:

posting online, you can figure out where

they stand on things and you can make

306

:

strategic decisions about where what

forum you wanted your case heard in, what

307

:

judge you wanted to end up in front of,

to the extent that you had the ability

308

:

to file in one place or the other.

309

:

That was a very important decision.

310

:

Christine: Yeah, and I think

that's one of the problems too.

311

:

Like you shouldn't know how your

judges vote, but you know, I follow

312

:

pol like local politics pretty closely

and get kind of obsessed with it in

313

:

a way that's like weird probably.

314

:

But yeah.

315

:

You know, we got the

TikTok judge, Denise Brown.

316

:

I mean, obviously she hates Donald Trump.

317

:

She does tiktoks about it.

318

:

Hugh: Sure.

319

:

Well, I mean, you have judges that.

320

:

Post pictures on social media of them

at events for a specific political

321

:

candidate for one of the parties.

322

:

So, you know, that was all very helpful to

me as an attorney, to know those things.

323

:

You're telegraphing things that are going

to help me make decisions for my clients.

324

:

So I, I'm not, you know, from the

outside neutrally, I don't like it.

325

:

I don't think that's, I don't think that's

proper, but when I was in the practice,

326

:

it was something that I could use and

make better decisions for my clients

327

:

Christine: and that goes so much.

328

:

You and I have talked about this, but so

much to the point that strategy matters

329

:

just as much as knowing the law and the

rules of procedure and rules of evidence

330

:

Hugh: more so when you know your

judges are less likely to enforce

331

:

the rules or to understand them, you

have to strategize on other things

332

:

like people's political leanings

or the things that make you angry.

333

:

When I talk about the strategies, like

finding ways to use up, well more than

334

:

your allotted time in court so the other

side doesn't get their points across,

335

:

ways to monopolize the room just.

336

:

I, because you're not, if you can't win

on the law and the rules because it's a

337

:

crapshoot, then you're going to try to

strategize in another way as an advocate.

338

:

That's sort of the way the practice works.

339

:

I,

340

:

July 29 Cam HW: yep.

341

:

Hugh: I would be mortified if I were the

client and those things were deciding

342

:

what was going to happen with the most

important assets in my life or my kids.

343

:

That's the world we live in and

that's what we practiced in.

344

:

Christine: Yeah, and I think

it's just gone too far.

345

:

Like we've gone over the hill as

far as that goes, but absolutely.

346

:

Strategy matters.

347

:

Strategy matters.

348

:

You guys, I cannot over articulate is

that even the right verbiage to say

349

:

how much strategy matters in court.

350

:

And I think this next viral clip will

kind of show maybe a little bit of how

351

:

you think the wrong strategy was used

and how I have PTSD from watching it.

352

:

Y'all wanna watch?

353

:

Hugh: Alright.

354

:

This is a clip we're gonna be watching.

355

:

We'll show it on the screen.

356

:

To those who are

listening, this is a clip.

357

:

From

358

:

inside a criminal courtroom, a

motion is made for discovery, which

359

:

would ordinarily, I guess, be, have

been provided from the prosecution.

360

:

Christine: Well, the guy's in custody

and they miss, they mention probation.

361

:

And it seems to me that the

attorney is not a public defender.

362

:

And I'll explain more once we watch.

363

:

No,

364

:

Hugh: I, I, I agree.

365

:

Christine: It's constitutionally

allowed or required.

366

:

July 29 wide CM: Yep.

367

:

Christine: And we were

talking about probation,

368

:

right?

369

:

Hugh: That statement that not a lot

of the attorneys have done that.

370

:

That's really telling.

371

:

Christine: Look at the poor defendant

372

:

Hugh: standing in a courtroom

with everyone looking at him

373

:

Christine: and yelling.

374

:

Everyone's yelling like children

375

:

proper way.

376

:

Hugh: Seems like a proper way

would be to file a motion, which

377

:

seems to be why they're in court.

378

:

Christine: I wonder if contact Mr.

379

:

Nichols is in their local rules.

380

:

She says it a lot.

381

:

Hugh: Didn't she say at

some point contact us?

382

:

July 29 Cam HW: Yeah.

383

:

Christine: And when talking about

being personally subpoenaed, that's

384

:

the probation officer likely.

385

:

All right, so you thought

that, what are your thoughts?

386

:

Hugh: So of all the ones that

we were reviewing for the one

387

:

today, I thought that was, that

one was in fairly in innocuous.

388

:

I think the things that bother me are

not the things that bother you, the

389

:

things that bother me, I don't like

when a court says, reach out to us and

390

:

they're referring to the prosecution,

and you just get this feeling

391

:

that it's all part of one machine.

392

:

Like the prosecution and the

court are not part of a team.

393

:

Yeah, yeah.

394

:

It's not us versus them, both government.

395

:

But that, yeah, that, that part

always, always bothered me from,

396

:

from my time in dependency court.

397

:

The other is.

398

:

My takeaway is more just attorneys

sometimes need to read the room, but

399

:

I, when the judge says attorneys,

not many attorneys around here

400

:

have done that, which is filing

a motion to compel discovery for

401

:

your defendant client, which.

402

:

If you're not provided

it, you have no choice.

403

:

You have to file that motion.

404

:

Christine: Well, what probably happened?

405

:

Okay, so it's a probation

revocation hearing likely because

406

:

there's a probation officer.

407

:

This one bothered me a lot because,

well, a lot of different reasons,

408

:

but that judge, first off, let's

just have the very, very frank

409

:

conversation about, if you wanna look

up the definition of mansplaining.

410

:

That's what that judge did.

411

:

She just has a vagina.

412

:

Okay.

413

:

And like I've talked before about female

judges being a problem, but the way

414

:

that she condescendingly explained how

to lawyer to a lawyer in is insulting.

415

:

But you have to think about when you

are in a room as a defense attorney

416

:

and the judge's first inclination

is to protect the prosecutor,

417

:

protect the probation officer.

418

:

What likely happened is.

419

:

He gets.

420

:

So it's a male defendant.

421

:

The attorney's a male, the defense

attorney gets a call, there's a probation

422

:

violation, family member calls and is

like, oh my God, you've got Eric and Eric

423

:

needs to get out on, is gonna miss work

and Eric's gonna miss all this stuff.

424

:

Here's $1,500.

425

:

Attorney picks up the phone, calls

the probation prosecutor, calls the

426

:

probation officer to get the report,

the detailed report of the violations.

427

:

And I'm just speculating, but it

sounds like the probation officer

428

:

was like, I'm not giving it to you.

429

:

I don't know you.

430

:

I don't know who you are.

431

:

Maybe the attorney was rude.

432

:

So the attorney's like, well,

we need to have a hearing.

433

:

I need to know what the violations

are as written in the report.

434

:

And instead of just getting that as

he should, he had to file a motion.

435

:

Yeah.

436

:

And so the defendant is, constitutional

rights are invoked the second

437

:

that you're in an orange jumpsuit.

438

:

Right.

439

:

And so the probation officer's like,

I'm God, I don't have to give you shit.

440

:

And I know when I go in here, my

judge is gonna do whatever I wanna do.

441

:

Hugh: That's how, that's how it felt.

442

:

It also felt like this

attorney might have been from.

443

:

Either practiced in another court Yeah.

444

:

Or from a different county because the

judge, as you said, mansplained how

445

:

things work in that court and everyone

just gets along and they just ask each

446

:

other for things informally, which I

just can't fathom an attorney filing

447

:

a motion to compel in an action like

this and getting it before the docket

448

:

if they had not picked up the phone and

tried to get it through other means.

449

:

It just doesn't make any sense that

you would file the motion first.

450

:

I would imagine that this

attorney asked for it.

451

:

Yep.

452

:

And was told, no, it's not happening.

453

:

And then you have a judge making excuses

that there was an oversight or some

454

:

making excuses for the prosecution, which.

455

:

Christine: And not even the

prosecution, also the probation office.

456

:

Yeah.

457

:

Which is also separate from the prosecutor

and oftentimes the probation officer.

458

:

Fair enough.

459

:

And the prosecutor are gonna

fight with one another too.

460

:

They're gonna have their

own political dramas.

461

:

But it's just the notion that when you

go into court as a defense attorney

462

:

and you have the judge first thought,

I'm gonna protect my prosecutor and I'm

463

:

gonna protect my probation officers.

464

:

Not holy shit.

465

:

There's a man in an orange jumpsuit

with his liberties being restrained.

466

:

Right.

467

:

Word.

468

:

And I'm going to yell at you.

469

:

Yeah, it's like, it's something that

could have happened also at a sidebar.

470

:

You know what counsel's

approached the bench.

471

:

You're new in this jurisdiction.

472

:

I'm gonna push the little white noise

button and explain it, instead of just

473

:

tearing him up and down in front of that

client and probably a wife or kids that

474

:

somehow came up with $1,500 to get him out

on probation in front of the whole thing.

475

:

Hugh: That's a really good point, and

that is something you do as a sidebar.

476

:

And the sidebar is where an attorney

a judge will call attorneys up to

477

:

the bar and they usually have some

white noise or something they put

478

:

on so no one else in the courtroom

can hear what they talk about.

479

:

And the judge can speak more frankly to

the attorneys or give some direction.

480

:

And since both of them are

standing there, there's nothing

481

:

wrong with them having that Yeah.

482

:

Conversation.

483

:

And they are often very helpful.

484

:

Mm-hmm.

485

:

And you want to know if you're stepping

in something or doing something

486

:

different than the judge would

like, and they tell you privately.

487

:

Yep.

488

:

Doesn't cause an issue with your

client, doesn't undermine their faith

489

:

in, in your ability to practice.

490

:

You certainly just don't want that

conversation on the record as an attorney.

491

:

But I will say, you know, when a

judge starts speaking, especially

492

:

when she says she's gonna grant

your motion, just be quiet.

493

:

Christine: I

494

:

I dunno.

495

:

I'm like, like, why the hell am I here?

496

:

Take the win.

497

:

Hugh: I agree.

498

:

I would be exasperated too, but

as soon as she said I'm going to

499

:

grant it, but she won't let me talk.

500

:

Maybe that's the cue to be quiet.

501

:

I'm not, this is coming from

502

:

Christine: an hourly

503

:

rate lawyer.

504

:

Yeah.

505

:

Not a flat rate lawyer that's wasted

all his time, drove 45 minutes.

506

:

I'm speculating, but drove 45

minutes to file a motion to get

507

:

something that he's constitutionally

entitled to and he's trying to say.

508

:

He's trying to say too, listen,

probation officer I ever call you

509

:

again, you better gimme what I need.

510

:

July 29 wide CM: Sure.

511

:

Christine: And the judge is saying,

oh, I got my probation officer's back.

512

:

See, that's to the other side of it that

I'm just like, also there's verbiage.

513

:

So, you don't need to be so

argumentative and defensive.

514

:

Okay.

515

:

Whoa.

516

:

Hugh: Who am I?

517

:

What am I doing here?

518

:

Am I a defense attorney?

519

:

I think I am.

520

:

Christine: Yeah.

521

:

That's like hashtag defense attorney.

522

:

Hashtag argumentative.

523

:

Put that on a billboard.

524

:

And I think these are the small

little things that it's not nearly as

525

:

egregious as some of the stuff that

we've watched, but it's also like.

526

:

Do you notice too, how that judge,

female judge, I'll say it again.

527

:

I know this is just my perspective,

but she doesn't have the ability

528

:

to tell him how to go to hell

where he looks forward to the trip.

529

:

Is that bad?

530

:

July 29 wide CM: No,

531

:

Christine: but she doesn't have

control over her courtroom.

532

:

She gets emotional.

533

:

And again, I'm a female, but she

gets emotional and she gets very

534

:

tit for tat with him in a way

that I don't think is ju judicial.

535

:

Well,

536

:

Hugh: she did

537

:

say, you don't want to interrupt me.

538

:

I, that's, that's control.

539

:

Christine: Oh, well, she,

well, she failed at it.

540

:

'cause I'd have kept talking.

541

:

I just, she did I command respect.

542

:

Yeah.

543

:

Hugh: Yeah.

544

:

I just, you know, and this is coming from

an, as someone who practiced hourly, I

545

:

would've been sitting there thinking,

why are we still talking about this?

546

:

What is this a therapy session?

547

:

Just say, granted, don't you know, there's

no reason for anyone to explain anything.

548

:

I'm filing a motion for something.

549

:

I'm constitutionally.

550

:

Entitled to, if you're gonna grant

it, grant it and say get it to him.

551

:

Get it to him by, you know,

today, leave here, you know,

552

:

make it available right away.

553

:

And then if we need to have a hearing,

and if it's not all there, counsel,

554

:

put a motion on and I'll grant you the

hearing and then move on to the next case.

555

:

Christine: Yeah.

556

:

It's just, you're in these big

courtrooms, especially in criminal court.

557

:

'cause they don't do these closed

courtrooms like civil family court does.

558

:

Like that is super rare.

559

:

Like, that doesn't happen in real court.

560

:

And when I say real court, I

mean, district or circuit court

561

:

criminal or civil family court

being closed is very unique.

562

:

But you will literally have like lined

up all the cops, all the probation

563

:

officers, the prosecutors, like

they, all the attorneys run the,

564

:

but it'll be on these motion hours.

565

:

It will be heavy, heavy, heavy public

defender, two public defenders versus

566

:

15 people that work for the state.

567

:

Just like sitting in court and

maybe a couple private attorneys.

568

:

Hugh: And the private

attorneys sometimes will go up

569

:

there and they'll call all

their cases right in a row so

570

:

they can get in, in and out.

571

:

And there's should No, no, I agree.

572

:

I'm just saying that

there's a protocol to it.

573

:

So if you're standing there

in that line, you're thinking.

574

:

Oh, come on.

575

:

Just be quiet.

576

:

Just grant the motion.

577

:

This is so absolutely 1 0 1.

578

:

Granted, let's move on.

579

:

I need to get to my case.

580

:

We don't need to, you know.

581

:

Oh, see, I'm

582

:

Christine: the

583

:

opposite.

584

:

A public defender.

585

:

I've been like, hell yeah.

586

:

Keep going.

587

:

Tell that judge.

588

:

Yeah.

589

:

I mean that's, yeah.

590

:

The difference, I think, I don't know.

591

:

Interesting point.

592

:

We do see a lot of these

viral clips differently.

593

:

Hugh: Well, I mean, from my point

of view, if the judge had started

594

:

that way with me, I'm thinking, what

does this look like to my client?

595

:

July 29 Cam HW: Mm-hmm.

596

:

Hugh: And good point, as soon

as I know I'm winning on it.

597

:

Mm-hmm.

598

:

It's, it's sort of like the, the way

they train you in trial law, if you.

599

:

Object and you lose on the

objection and it's clear.

600

:

You can't argue your way around it.

601

:

Some objections you, you can tell

that there's, if you argue and

602

:

you present exactly why you're

objecting, you probably will win.

603

:

But otherwise you lose.

604

:

You say thank you, yes, you say thank

you to the people in the courtroom.

605

:

It's not 100% clear that you lost.

606

:

You're not arguing.

607

:

It doesn't, you know, it doesn't

harm you to, let's say the witness.

608

:

If you're questioning a witness that's

an adverse witness and you lose on

609

:

an objection that the other side

is giving and you say thank you and

610

:

you just move forward confidently.

611

:

You have continued to control

the room and you are not on your

612

:

heels for that witness who's

automatically, who's defensive anyway.

613

:

So to a certain extent,

614

:

thinking about those things.

615

:

If the judge says, I'm going to grant it,

then I'm just gonna shut up, sit down.

616

:

I'm not going to get into it any further.

617

:

I'm gonna lean over to the

client, say, we got it.

618

:

They're gonna have to give this discovery.

619

:

Then I would say, judge, thank you.

620

:

When can I have this?

621

:

My client is missing work.

622

:

I'm doing all these things.

623

:

When am I going to get this?

624

:

Christine: Well, you wouldn't

write a dissertation on it.

625

:

And that segues into, I, I

think in that case you need to

626

:

Hugh: be quiet and you

mustn't write a dissertation.

627

:

Christine: Oh, this segues into

Judge Jessica Stone, y'all.

628

:

This is Division Five's Louisville

Judge that called us cartoons and media.

629

:

So I'm very excited about that.

630

:

We got our press pass via Judge Stone.

631

:

Can I do a little backstory on her?

632

:

Hugh: Go for it.

633

:

Christine: So Judge Jessica Stone was

a prior prosecutor district court.

634

:

She had a pretty contentious divorce in

Division five and she's an attorney and

635

:

she decided to run for family court judge.

636

:

And she won.

637

:

Okay.

638

:

She had never practiced family

law in any capacity, and it's my

639

:

understanding that she ran because

she had problems with the system.

640

:

Is that your understanding?

641

:

That,

642

:

Hugh: that, those were all

the rumors that I heard.

643

:

Yeah.

644

:

Which I kind of thought, well good.

645

:

If you have issues with the system.

646

:

Let's see.

647

:

See if you can fix them.

648

:

Christine: Yeah.

649

:

The Courier did a whole article on

it about how, you know, everybody

650

:

wished her well after she won.

651

:

Well, I would say it took her about 27.3

652

:

seconds once she put that black robe

on to just fully drink the Kool-Aid.

653

:

Hugh: Yeah.

654

:

I can't say that I noticed any

difference from the very beginning,

655

:

from the remainder of, of family court.

656

:

It was just business as usual.

657

:

Nothing, nothing changed other than

there was some wrangling over staff.

658

:

July 29 Cam HW: Yeah.

659

:

And

660

:

Hugh: some, some things like that.

661

:

But as far as the way the dockets were

run, how people were treated, , the

662

:

court appointments and the, you

know, rubber stamping what GS and

663

:

FOCs would say, that kind of stuff

seemed to just continue as usual.

664

:

Christine: Now, I'll tell you, I

mean, in all honesty, I'm, I don't

665

:

wanna bring any levity to this.

666

:

I'm not being dramatic.

667

:

I hadn't watched motion hour and

probably a year when I went for

668

:

the baby case and I sat in on her.

669

:

Motion hour and truly aghast.

670

:

She doesn't understand

rudimentary concepts of law.

671

:

And I am genuinely concerned,

and I know a lot of Louisville

672

:

litigators share this concern.

673

:

I spoke to people afterwards.

674

:

I'm afraid that somebody's gonna

get hurt with one of her rulings.

675

:

'cause I don't think she has

any idea what she's doing.

676

:

Hugh: The one thing I, I can say that

I'm thinking a little bit more about.

677

:

When she first started, I did find

that she had the demeanor and the way

678

:

that she spoke to people at motion

hour, starting off like, here I'm

679

:

a new judge, I'm still learning.

680

:

She, there wasn't a huge ego to where

you could point out that there were

681

:

errors and issues and she was very

willing to say, okay, you're right.

682

:

I, I, it looks like I'm

gonna re-look at this.

683

:

And she would go back and actually mm-hmm.

684

:

July 29 Cam HW: Look at

685

:

Hugh: it, which.

686

:

It's kind of rare.

687

:

Now we have some judges that will still

do that and they've been on the bench

688

:

forever and they still will do that.

689

:

And to their credit, they can

admit when they're wrong and they

690

:

can go back and re-look at things.

691

:

But that was a very, that was one thing

that was positive to me at the beginning.

692

:

I thought, well this could be something

where, you know, we politely file 59

693

:

0 5 motions or motions to reconsider

in things that we will still get some,

694

:

you know, so 15 nine get some results

695

:

Christine: would

696

:

be like something though.

697

:

She, what he means by that is

like politely file something.

698

:

I do not mean to interrupt

you, but just like

699

:

July 29 wide CM: mm-hmm.

700

:

Christine: When you, the judge gets

the law blatantly wrong or gets a

701

:

ruling blatantly wrong, you gotta,

702

:

July 29 wide CM: that

could be a fact as well.

703

:

Yeah.

704

:

Christine: A fact.

705

:

But you file just to say, Hey

judge, like look at this law

706

:

fact testimony, et cetera.

707

:

And you do that politely, but Yeah.

708

:

Sorry.

709

:

Yeah, you do.

710

:

Hugh: I

711

:

mean, you point out you point out

the manifest errors of fact law

712

:

under the rule and you say, you

said that this was the wife's.

713

:

Premarital property in order to

her, it was actually the husbands.

714

:

And I think that you, you know,

just misread, you know, if something

715

:

happened, but you clearly didn't

mean this, but this was in the order.

716

:

It needs to be corrected.

717

:

Mm-hmm.

718

:

And those things will be corrected.

719

:

And some judges will look and

say, oh man, I'm sorry about that.

720

:

We all make mistakes.

721

:

We correct it.

722

:

Yeah.

723

:

That's why the rule is

there and it, and it works.

724

:

And then there are some that absolutely

you can't challenge them if you say that

725

:

that's not even a party to the case.

726

:

You use the wrong name, still

won't correct it and will slam you.

727

:

And so I had had some experience with one

of our current judges who just wouldn't

728

:

correct basic things that, that were,

he just would reverse the parties and

729

:

rulings and I couldn't get them corrected.

730

:

So when I saw her willing to correct

things and say, yep, I may have,

731

:

I may have gotten that wrong.

732

:

I, I, that was huge for me.

733

:

I, I, I was very hopeful that we

would have somebody that would, you

734

:

know, you still take a look at things.

735

:

Oh,

736

:

Christine: si.

737

:

It's really difficult.

738

:

And I do get, from the attorneys I

talk to, they're just like I said,

739

:

some fundamental things that I

don't think she knows the law on.

740

:

I have not heard one, and lemme be very

clear, I have not heard one positive

741

:

thing from any attorney in her division.

742

:

Period.

743

:

And I, I do hear it about other judges.

744

:

Hugh: Yeah, no, I mean, I,

I will say that that's true.

745

:

There were, there were people that I, I

spoke with and I would, you know, bitch

746

:

and moan about certain people, court

appointed people or you know, people

747

:

that were involved in so many cases.

748

:

And there, there were some attorneys

that had been around for a long time

749

:

that always would have positive things

to say, to sort of, well, that's okay.

750

:

But sometimes that person, you know, would

always say things positive and, and the.

751

:

It didn't generally happen when you

were talking about division five.

752

:

And this is

753

:

Christine: Jessica Stone, and this

is the Facebook post that Alison

754

:

Russell initially did talking about

judgy, but she made a comment on there

755

:

and we'll share it on the screen.

756

:

But essentially she just said, we can't be

distracted from cartoons and press media.

757

:

Media.

758

:

Yeah.

759

:

Media.

760

:

Media we're media.

761

:

And that, that takes away, we mustn't take

away from the hard work that Division five

762

:

does every day, which of course there were

like three attorneys that are like, oh

763

:

my gosh, you have the hardest job ever.

764

:

Oh my God, I love you.

765

:

Hashtag you know, blowing

kisses and things like that.

766

:

Again, I'm being a bit facetious

and sarcastic, but one.

767

:

Judges.

768

:

Y'all aren't that dumb.

769

:

You know that anybody that does

that on Facebook is talking

770

:

about you behind your back.

771

:

The second they hit enter on

that post, let me just tell you.

772

:

Okay.

773

:

Two.

774

:

And I do think judges realize that

also all the people, and you don't

775

:

get mad at me, all the people that

are making those sort of posts are

776

:

the attorneys that are probably

making between 50 and $75,000 a year.

777

:

You know, I mean, no one will go harder

for the system than the worker bee

778

:

that's making 50 to $75,000 a year.

779

:

That like gets a little bit of clout.

780

:

'cause they get invited to a Christmas

party at the judges like guest house.

781

:

You know what I mean?

782

:

Hugh: Well, or the ones that

are taking court appointments.

783

:

Christine: Yeah,

784

:

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

785

:

Oh, these are, I mean, I think all the

positive comments were court appointments.

786

:

Maybe not one attorney or two.

787

:

Hugh: Oh, I, oh, I agree.

788

:

Mm-hmm.

789

:

And then there's some of the same

people that leave positive reviews for

790

:

court systems, which Google reviews.

791

:

Wow.

792

:

Yeah.

793

:

Google reviews for, for.

794

:

Municipal court systems.

795

:

That's some apple polishing.

796

:

That's amazing.

797

:

Christine: Oh my goodness.

798

:

And so also, let's just

debate to the ethics of Judge

799

:

Stone saying that about us.

800

:

Like, what was she one thinking?

801

:

I know people that are waiting, and I

know numerous attorneys that are waiting

802

:

for orders from her from March and April.

803

:

But what was she thinking, do you think?

804

:

Hugh: I read it as being defensive

about our, our roll calls with the

805

:

judges that when she's not on the bench

and we're pointing out who, well, we

806

:

haven't pointed out specifically which

divisions are there, but we are pointing

807

:

out that there are a lot of people

that are not there in the middle of the

808

:

workday on multiple days of the week.

809

:

Mm-hmm.

810

:

It seemed the, the tone to me was,

well, I would respond to this, but

811

:

I'm way too busy working on, you know,

my job as a, a family court judge.

812

:

Christine: I'm way too busy, but I

have time to post on social media.

813

:

Well,

814

:

Hugh: it.

815

:

Christine: I, I just, you

know, bless her heart again,

816

:

that's gonna be my new hashtag.

817

:

Bless all their hearts.

818

:

Seriously though, Jessica Stone we would

like for you to, we would like for all

819

:

the judges to do a good job in court.

820

:

Seriously, there are families and children

that it's literally life or death.

821

:

And so I hope that instead of getting

on Facebook or taking the time to get on

822

:

Reddit and talk about me, that maybe there

are a lot of free CLEs in family law.

823

:

And we talk a lot about the rules

of evidence and things that can make

824

:

the system better on this podcast.

825

:

And I do on TikTok as well.

826

:

So you could, you know, certainly

subscribe to our channel.

827

:

Maybe you'll learn a

thing or two, I swear.

828

:

Parties, in turn, cameras on.

829

:

Speak to people with respect.

830

:

You got anything else?

831

:

Hugh: Oh, gross.

832

:

Revenue of a business versus income.

833

:

Christine: I can't.

834

:

That's

835

:

Hugh: a, that's a, that's a good one.

836

:

Christine: Oh my goodness.

837

:

Actually we do, we'll do

a little segment on that.

838

:

We should, because gr Did you

guys know that gross income

839

:

and net income are different?

840

:

Hugh: I

841

:

bet you did.

842

:

Christine: Oh my goodness.

843

:

And so, I am,

844

:

Hugh: it's so bad and it's, it just

seems so petty to say, and it seems like

845

:

we're making this up, but we're not.

846

:

This is the stuff that we struggled with

and that people would spend $50,000 Oh.

847

:

And we would have to appeal.

848

:

And you, , a regular appeal on something

property related that's not expedited is,

849

:

is a year and a halfs a year and a half.

850

:

It has been for the last 10, 15 years.

851

:

They take a year and a half, and then

you end up back in front of the same

852

:

judge and have to politely explain that.

853

:

This is business revenue on the tax

return that my business made $7 million.

854

:

Mm-hmm.

855

:

I have a salary of $75,000.

856

:

We have lots of people

that work for the business.

857

:

I didn't make millions of dollars.

858

:

Like there is a difference.

859

:

This is a tax return, but

it's, it was shocking how often

860

:

that happened that Oh yeah.

861

:

Someone could come in with one page of a

business tax return with a motion and say,

862

:

this person makes $50,000 a month and you

can see from this business tax return.

863

:

So they should pay maintenance.

864

:

And then you walk outta motion

hour and they'd be ordered

865

:

to pay all kinds of money.

866

:

And you'd have a hearing

six, seven months later.

867

:

Yep.

868

:

And it would be a temporary order.

869

:

And there's nothing you could do

because a judge doesn't understand

870

:

that someone's business where

they might have 50 employees.

871

:

Makes money, but that doesn't mean

that that's the income of the party.

872

:

Christine: Oh, y'all,

you have No, it's mind

873

:

Hugh: blowing.

874

:

Had

875

:

Christine: idea how often

judges do not consider payroll.

876

:

Like they don't deduct payroll

of a company, any expenses.

877

:

They calculate child support and

maintenance and I mean obviously the

878

:

other expenses too are egregious,

but payroll of other employees, other

879

:

constituents of Louisville, it's just

a fundamental lack of understanding of,

880

:

, Hugh: But it's not that, okay,

somebody needs to sit down and

881

:

learn how to re a tax return.

882

:

The statute says for

self-employed individuals,

883

:

here's how you calculate income.

884

:

So the legislature has given us a black

and white list of things to look at.

885

:

Yeah, you take the gross revenue and you

subtract out legitimate business expenses.

886

:

It's not, you don't take the gross

revenue and say, that's the income

887

:

and I'm gonna, I'm gonna divide up

all the property and order maintenance

888

:

and child support based on that.

889

:

But

890

:

Christine: it

891

:

sure should not rocket science.

892

:

Hugh: science.

893

:

Christine: And that goes to, we talked

last time about these judges not

894

:

having had clients sometimes because

they went from the prosecutor's

895

:

standpoint and Jessica Stone was a prior

prosecutor at the district court level.

896

:

But just understanding

how companies even work.

897

:

I mean, when we were

practicing, I was solo.

898

:

I did have a firm, you had a huge firm.

899

:

But there is a shit ton of

business decisions that have

900

:

to be made on top of clients.

901

:

Hugh: I remember we had a, an issue of

substance abuse in a company that was

902

:

owned by the husband and the wife and

the wife had access to, she ran the

903

:

books and had access to the cash and

control of things, whereas the, the

904

:

husband, my client did the operations,

but it was the wife that had the.

905

:

Substance abuse issue and was emptying the

bank accounts and was spending money on

906

:

things and was, was going to destroy the

business, ultimately destroy the business.

907

:

So ultimately, when a business is the

subject of litigation and it has to

908

:

be preserved, the court will basically

appoint someone to run the business

909

:

or to oversee, to make sure it's

preserved and not run into the ground.

910

:

So in order to protect the company from.

911

:

What ultimately was its demise.

912

:

I filed a motion to place the company in

receivership so the court could administer

913

:

and monitor the running of the company.

914

:

So its assets were not wasted.

915

:

July 29 Cam HW: Yeah.

916

:

So

917

:

Hugh: simple motion.

918

:

Oh, there were two motions.

919

:

One for contempt because she had

the wife had violated a bunch of

920

:

orders about spending business

money on personal pursuits.

921

:

And then to I also asked to place

the company in receivership.

922

:

And, and

923

:

Christine: you explained

all this in your motion.

924

:

I'm sure I

925

:

Hugh: explained it in the motion.

926

:

I talked about how it worked.

927

:

I appeared at motion hour

to make the argument.

928

:

I was absolutely convinced that the

judge had not even looked at the motion

929

:

when I asked to place to appoint a

receiver to help run the business.

930

:

I think I had explained

how it had to work.

931

:

'cause the business actually

was located in Florida.

932

:

Okay.

933

:

So we were gonna have

to involve a Florida.

934

:

The question from the judge

was, what's a receiver?

935

:

Christine: What Judge?

936

:

Hugh: TikTok judge.

937

:

So it got denied and ultimately they.

938

:

Used up all the cash.

939

:

The only thing left from that

business were a couple contracts,

940

:

which were still valuable.

941

:

Yeah.

942

:

And they divided up who got to serve

the contracts for this company, but they

943

:

divided up the actual physical property of

a company, which everyone knows is usually

944

:

not the bulk of the value of a company.

945

:

And it was because all the cash went away.

946

:

There just wasn't an understanding

of what a court could do.

947

:

It was, I was faced with,

well that's, that's bad.

948

:

Let's get a hearing.

949

:

What?

950

:

I can't do anything.

951

:

What do you want me to do, Mr.

952

:

Barrow?

953

:

What do you want me to do?

954

:

Like, what do you mean?

955

:

You can't

956

:

Christine: order someone to not dissipate

the marital estate if you can't do

957

:

it as a family court judge who can,

958

:

Hugh: well, they did.

959

:

They ordered it.

960

:

They were violating it, and so we

couldn't get them to stop violating it.

961

:

We filed a motion for contempt.

962

:

We are getting a hearing, but in the

interim, this is the marital asset.

963

:

Yeah.

964

:

That's everything that actually owned

the property where the parties lived.

965

:

July 29 Cam HW: Mm-hmm.

966

:

It was

967

:

Hugh: the entire marital estate.

968

:

This was a marriage without kids.

969

:

You have to stop it from being

wasted until you can figure out Yeah.

970

:

What is going on And.

971

:

It just, , it was like my, I was

just an being annoying by asking

972

:

the court to actually do something

about it and was just got nothing and

973

:

the parties ended up with nothing.

974

:

Christine: Which I mean also on top of

that, which is horrific in and of itself.

975

:

And if the court, the court absolutely

has the authority to put things in

976

:

place or incarcerate people and you

can have a quick turnaround for a

977

:

hearing, but also my God should be

978

:

July 29 wide CM: able

979

:

Christine: to, yeah.

980

:

They have the power to.

981

:

Yeah.

982

:

But my God, what if something would've

happened if you're dealing with substance

983

:

abuse and someone had lost their life too.

984

:

Hugh: Sure.

985

:

Or a kid.

986

:

Yeah.

987

:

I mean, if you were dealing with.

988

:

Kids issues.

989

:

Well, what do you want me to do?

990

:

I would imagine I wouldn't be faced

with the same thing related to kids.

991

:

'cause judges don't mind making rulings

from motion hour on the bench without

992

:

a hearing about people's kids, but

protecting a piece of property where there

993

:

is a clear system for how to do this.

994

:

Mm-hmm.

995

:

I mean, when courts do this all the

time, when you're dealing with naming

996

:

a company as part of a debt dispute.

997

:

Yep.

998

:

Or a bankruptcy, a liquidation, there's,

there's all kinds of cases where a

999

:

judge has to appoint someone to run a

company or to oversee it, to make sure

:

00:42:15,571 --> 00:42:18,901

that it's protected until the interest

in that company can be resolved.

:

00:42:19,294 --> 00:42:22,864

Christine: Otherwise, there's no

incentive for someone to follow the rules.

:

00:42:22,864 --> 00:42:28,054

And I get that a lot in family

court in particular, that perjury,

:

00:42:28,144 --> 00:42:29,524

you know, is not really a thing.

:

00:42:29,524 --> 00:42:31,414

People lie all the time in family court.

:

00:42:31,414 --> 00:42:33,244

There are no consequences for it.

:

00:42:33,484 --> 00:42:36,574

Now, obviously our perjury

statute is in Kentucky.

:

00:42:36,574 --> 00:42:40,024

I'm not necessarily saying people that

lie in family court should go to jail.

:

00:42:40,024 --> 00:42:42,964

I don't really believe in

incarcerating people to the extent,

:

00:42:42,964 --> 00:42:46,024

like over incarcerating people

or utilizing that as a tool.

:

00:42:46,204 --> 00:42:49,534

That being said, if there

aren't any consequences, it's

:

00:42:49,534 --> 00:42:51,124

almost like it's encouraged.

:

00:42:51,226 --> 00:42:53,516

Hugh: That's exactly what

the result of this felt like.

:

00:42:53,516 --> 00:42:53,696

Yeah.

:

00:42:53,786 --> 00:42:56,096

That the judge denied that motion.

:

00:42:56,096 --> 00:43:02,576

She set a hearing for contempt, which was,

you know, probably months, months away.

:

00:43:03,086 --> 00:43:07,766

And behavior not only continued as

normal, but it became more brazen.

:

00:43:07,886 --> 00:43:07,976

Yep.

:

00:43:08,006 --> 00:43:10,466

Because, oh, well you tried

to stop me now you can't.

:

00:43:10,526 --> 00:43:12,026

And that was the end of it.

:

00:43:12,026 --> 00:43:14,576

You can't go recapture that money.

:

00:43:14,685 --> 00:43:15,034

Christine: Right.

:

00:43:15,154 --> 00:43:16,504

Half of nothing is nothing.

:

00:43:16,795 --> 00:43:17,066

Hugh: Yeah.

:

00:43:17,066 --> 00:43:17,606

It's gone.

:

00:43:17,721 --> 00:43:18,011

Christine: Gone.

:

00:43:18,176 --> 00:43:18,746

Oh my goodness.

:

00:43:18,746 --> 00:43:18,840

And

:

00:43:18,874 --> 00:43:21,754

obviously that judge has no business,

in my opinion, in my opinion.

:

00:43:21,754 --> 00:43:24,254

So low opinion doing high asset cases.

:

00:43:24,254 --> 00:43:27,549

We don't have many on the bench

that have the, brain function, the

:

00:43:27,549 --> 00:43:32,149

wherewithal to understand complex

financial issues, in my opinion.

:

00:43:32,149 --> 00:43:36,809

Again but also that goes to the fact

that I am, I gotta look up how long

:

00:43:36,809 --> 00:43:39,809

I've been actually out of it, but

I'd say over two years at this point.

:

00:43:40,199 --> 00:43:43,559

And you're four or five months

maybe since your retirement,

:

00:43:43,559 --> 00:43:43,560

Hugh: four

:

00:43:43,686 --> 00:43:44,166

Four months

:

00:43:44,256 --> 00:43:45,246

Christine: working your ass off.

:

00:43:45,456 --> 00:43:45,546

Hugh: Yep.

:

00:43:45,816 --> 00:43:50,496

Christine: But , the role or like the

transition from litigator to advocate

:

00:43:50,496 --> 00:43:56,436

is one that I kind of want to, if you're

not weird with it, do like a touch

:

00:43:56,436 --> 00:44:01,086

point every podcast or once a week

kind of about like how it's changed.

:

00:44:01,116 --> 00:44:01,806

Do you know what I'm saying?

:

00:44:01,806 --> 00:44:01,896

Sure.

:

00:44:02,076 --> 00:44:02,466

Yeah.

:

00:44:02,471 --> 00:44:04,566

Because like for example,

yesterday when you watched

:

00:44:04,566 --> 00:44:06,096

those reunification camp videos

:

00:44:06,793 --> 00:44:07,153

, Hugh: Yep.

:

00:44:07,243 --> 00:44:10,843

I still jump very easily

back into advocacy mode and I

:

00:44:10,843 --> 00:44:12,193

was blown away that, that I.

:

00:44:13,468 --> 00:44:18,118

Well, the biggest takeaway right now

from me was that I had my nose down and

:

00:44:18,118 --> 00:44:22,558

was just working my cases for so long

that I was blind to all these things

:

00:44:22,558 --> 00:44:23,633

that were going on behind the scenes.

:

00:44:23,633 --> 00:44:23,913

Mm-hmm.

:

00:44:23,993 --> 00:44:27,298

Or were going on in other jurisdictions

that I've now learned through this

:

00:44:27,298 --> 00:44:31,508

project with you that I Yeah, it

was, but that was still shocking.

:

00:44:31,921 --> 00:44:32,161

Christine: Yeah.

:

00:44:32,161 --> 00:44:33,271

And it's the same with me.

:

00:44:33,271 --> 00:44:36,391

Like I really, I know this is

so naive to all the listeners.

:

00:44:36,451 --> 00:44:39,631

I thought we had a Louisville

family court problem.

:

00:44:40,021 --> 00:44:42,511

I did not realize it was

a family court problem.

:

00:44:42,691 --> 00:44:45,981

I didn't realize it was , the judiciary

is out of control and there's no

:

00:44:45,981 --> 00:44:48,231

judicial accountability problem.

:

00:44:48,291 --> 00:44:52,951

And yesterday we had a strategy meeting

and had some atrium beers, which

:

00:44:52,951 --> 00:44:56,791

were delicious at, that's a local

brewery here, but I showed him the

:

00:44:56,791 --> 00:45:01,694

reunification video from Sebastian and

I think it's Amaya Outta California

:

00:45:01,988 --> 00:45:02,678

Hugh: Reunification Camp.

:

00:45:02,948 --> 00:45:03,518

Christine: Yes.

:

00:45:03,518 --> 00:45:03,578

Yeah.

:

00:45:03,888 --> 00:45:04,848

If I misspoke, sorry.

:

00:45:04,968 --> 00:45:05,388

Hugh: No, no, no.

:

00:45:05,388 --> 00:45:06,768

Just the, the camp part was

:

00:45:06,801 --> 00:45:08,111

what was shocking to me that.

:

00:45:08,523 --> 00:45:08,763

Yes.

:

00:45:08,763 --> 00:45:13,743

In order to heal a relationship between

a child that may have been abused by

:

00:45:13,743 --> 00:45:17,193

a parent, you send them, you isolate

them from the parent that they're

:

00:45:17,193 --> 00:45:23,043

bonded to and send them to a camp for

intensive one-on-one time for weeks.

:

00:45:23,253 --> 00:45:23,403

Christine: Mm-hmm.

:

00:45:23,643 --> 00:45:27,333

Hugh: With the parent who, you

know, allegedly was abusing

:

00:45:27,491 --> 00:45:30,031

Christine: or that they were

allegedly alienated from.

:

00:45:30,251 --> 00:45:32,231

It's just, it was, it's a shit show.

:

00:45:32,291 --> 00:45:34,241

They've been outlawed in California.

:

00:45:34,451 --> 00:45:38,821

But I think that's why we have so many

people in the family court reform or

:

00:45:38,821 --> 00:45:45,161

abolished family court movement that

have such strong beliefs is because some

:

00:45:45,161 --> 00:45:48,491

of this stuff is happening and a lot of

it's happening, like to pro se litigants

:

00:45:48,521 --> 00:45:50,231

and a lot of attorneys just don't know.

:

00:45:50,231 --> 00:45:51,131

I had no idea.

:

00:45:51,251 --> 00:45:52,661

I had no idea when I was practicing.

:

00:45:53,025 --> 00:45:53,163

Hugh: Yeah.

:

00:45:53,403 --> 00:45:56,283

I mean, I'm interested to learn

more about where that came from.

:

00:45:56,283 --> 00:45:58,383

Did it come from a legislative initiative?

:

00:45:58,383 --> 00:46:01,863

Did it come from state politics

or did it come from the bench?

:

00:46:01,893 --> 00:46:04,353

I mean, a lot of those, when you get into.

:

00:46:05,133 --> 00:46:08,493

Certain kinds of camps or

reprogramming and things, those

:

00:46:08,493 --> 00:46:11,553

usually are not coming from court.

:

00:46:11,553 --> 00:46:15,603

Those are coming from some political

agenda and written into state laws.

:

00:46:15,603 --> 00:46:17,443

So that that would be interesting.

:

00:46:17,546 --> 00:46:22,676

Christine: from an industry that

makes a shit ton of money in certain

:

00:46:22,676 --> 00:46:26,126

reunification therapy tactics.

:

00:46:26,546 --> 00:46:28,976

It's just like the

troubled teen industry Now.

:

00:46:28,976 --> 00:46:32,216

That's something, it's one of those

things where when you talk about

:

00:46:32,246 --> 00:46:35,636

it in family court, people can sort

of label you one way or the other.

:

00:46:35,636 --> 00:46:38,396

But if you talk about the troubled

teen industry, I think now as a

:

00:46:38,396 --> 00:46:42,296

society, we absolutely acknowledge

that the camps that Paris Hilton

:

00:46:42,296 --> 00:46:44,516

were going to were disgusting, right?

:

00:46:44,516 --> 00:46:47,906

I mean, and there was a lot of federal

matching federal funds were given.

:

00:46:47,906 --> 00:46:52,016

And then there was also the privatization

of it where you had wealthy people with

:

00:46:52,016 --> 00:46:55,616

children that were quote unquote out

of control, and they were sold a dream

:

00:46:55,616 --> 00:46:58,676

that just wasn't true and they were

just laughing all the way to the bank.

:

00:46:59,066 --> 00:47:02,306

But the notion that when

you have an industry.

:

00:47:02,651 --> 00:47:06,101

That is ripe for money, like

with these custodial evaluators

:

00:47:06,101 --> 00:47:09,491

and some of these treatments for

people going through family court.

:

00:47:09,821 --> 00:47:13,051

It just lends to the fact,

or it goes to the fact that

:

00:47:13,051 --> 00:47:14,521

it could be easily exploited.

:

00:47:14,731 --> 00:47:15,931

God bless, I can't speak today.

:

00:47:15,988 --> 00:47:17,368

Hugh: Yeah, no, I, I agree.

:

00:47:17,368 --> 00:47:18,208

I mean, we see it.

:

00:47:18,598 --> 00:47:19,078

We see it.

:

00:47:19,078 --> 00:47:20,758

You see it in domestic violence cases.

:

00:47:20,758 --> 00:47:20,878

Yeah.

:

00:47:20,878 --> 00:47:21,328

As well.

:

00:47:21,358 --> 00:47:26,008

You see just cookie cutter solutions

that, okay, you have to go to this,

:

00:47:26,038 --> 00:47:29,698

go through this program, and then we

will just, you know that here's your

:

00:47:29,698 --> 00:47:32,218

package, here's the package deal of

what you're gonna get and what you're

:

00:47:32,218 --> 00:47:36,448

gonna go through, and that it certainly

doesn't help or solve anything there.

:

00:47:36,448 --> 00:47:40,228

There are so many programs that people

go through with the court system,

:

00:47:40,588 --> 00:47:45,268

and I am, I remember one single time

in my career that someone told me.

:

00:47:45,668 --> 00:47:49,358

That they really found the

court's families in transition

:

00:47:49,568 --> 00:47:51,458

parenting program to be helpful.

:

00:47:51,758 --> 00:47:54,818

And my only thought about that

was, oh, bless your heart.

:

00:47:55,238 --> 00:47:55,358

Amen.

:

00:47:55,658 --> 00:47:58,508

Like, how in the world did

you find that to be helpful?

:

00:47:58,508 --> 00:48:00,548

There's a lot of feel good stuff.

:

00:48:00,548 --> 00:48:03,248

There's a lot of jump through hoops,

there's a lot of money changing hands.

:

00:48:03,278 --> 00:48:03,368

Mm-hmm.

:

00:48:03,668 --> 00:48:04,928

About these programs.

:

00:48:05,911 --> 00:48:09,571

Christine: there's a prosecutor out of

New York that talks about, there were two

:

00:48:09,571 --> 00:48:10,711

different programs he mentioned there.

:

00:48:10,711 --> 00:48:12,481

There's batters intervention program.

:

00:48:12,486 --> 00:48:12,586

Mm-hmm.

:

00:48:12,666 --> 00:48:15,301

Which if you have a domestic

violence order issued against you,

:

00:48:15,301 --> 00:48:19,291

you're required by state law to

attend batterers intervention.

:

00:48:19,291 --> 00:48:20,581

And it's a part of your court order.

:

00:48:20,801 --> 00:48:23,531

And obviously guess who's

making money on those?

:

00:48:23,861 --> 00:48:27,581

But there's a prosecutor out in New

York that's like, we have never had

:

00:48:27,581 --> 00:48:30,371

higher rates of domestic violence,

but we have more people go into

:

00:48:30,371 --> 00:48:31,931

these batters intervention programs.

:

00:48:31,991 --> 00:48:32,921

Do they work?

:

00:48:33,351 --> 00:48:36,381

And then also the Families in

Transition is a program that

:

00:48:36,381 --> 00:48:37,851

we have here in Kentucky.

:

00:48:38,061 --> 00:48:42,141

. You file for divorce, you're

required to go to this class.

:

00:48:42,171 --> 00:48:44,991

That is just complete, in my opinion.

:

00:48:45,051 --> 00:48:45,561

Bullshit.

:

00:48:46,288 --> 00:48:46,588

Hugh: Yeah.

:

00:48:46,588 --> 00:48:52,098

I, you know, to a point you made earlier,

, I'm not an abolished family court.

:

00:48:52,833 --> 00:48:57,003

Type I I think that there are very

intelligent people on the bench that

:

00:48:57,003 --> 00:49:00,393

could handle things, and I think the

things that, what frustrated me most

:

00:49:00,393 --> 00:49:04,203

in my litigation practice were the

things that were messed up were simple

:

00:49:04,203 --> 00:49:08,538

things that you didn't have to be super

intelligent to understand and that they

:

00:49:08,853 --> 00:49:11,283

are experts that you get involved in.

:

00:49:11,313 --> 00:49:15,573

If you have a high asset case,

you, you know, I know the judges

:

00:49:15,573 --> 00:49:17,373

have thousands of cases, they do.

:

00:49:17,733 --> 00:49:21,753

I you want to have experts that can

crunch the numbers because the judges

:

00:49:21,783 --> 00:49:24,963

simply are, you're never going to

have judges that have time to do that.

:

00:49:24,963 --> 00:49:30,363

So it, I don't, didn't ever think

that it was an issue of intelligence.

:

00:49:30,723 --> 00:49:35,093

And I also think that, I also think

that there is something to be said

:

00:49:35,093 --> 00:49:39,353

for when people start going through

a divorce, some basic education on

:

00:49:39,353 --> 00:49:42,563

how to speak with one another, how to

co-parent how to do all of that stuff.

:

00:49:42,563 --> 00:49:46,133

But as soon as you turn it into a

factory, that's super cookie cutter.

:

00:49:46,463 --> 00:49:48,653

And it's sort of like when

they send people to traffic

:

00:49:48,653 --> 00:49:50,153

school for a traffic violation.

:

00:49:50,243 --> 00:49:50,453

Oh my gosh.

:

00:49:50,483 --> 00:49:53,483

You're gonna go in on Saturday morning,

you're gonna look at your phone and play

:

00:49:53,483 --> 00:49:54,893

games, not pay attention to anything.

:

00:49:54,893 --> 00:49:56,303

You're gonna get your

certificate and you're gonna

:

00:49:56,303 --> 00:49:57,503

get out of it and move forward.

:

00:49:57,848 --> 00:49:59,198

That's what was happening.

:

00:49:59,198 --> 00:50:02,378

And those same people would go and

bad mouth each other the next day

:

00:50:02,708 --> 00:50:04,088

and not follow any of the rules.

:

00:50:04,088 --> 00:50:06,128

So it was an ineffective system.

:

00:50:06,218 --> 00:50:06,283

Christine: Mm-hmm.

:

00:50:06,701 --> 00:50:10,211

Well I just think if you put money in

anything then it's gonna lead to the

:

00:50:10,211 --> 00:50:13,901

possibility of the C word corruption.

:

00:50:13,901 --> 00:50:17,051

And I hate to use that word 'cause

I do think it's so polarizing.

:

00:50:17,381 --> 00:50:20,261

But I really think you have to

in some regards follow the money.

:

00:50:20,261 --> 00:50:23,501

And there are just a lot of people

with their hands out when it

:

00:50:23,501 --> 00:50:27,221

comes to family court and also

other court ordered treatments.

:

00:50:27,221 --> 00:50:30,431

I mean, arc is a huge one, which

we can't go down that rabbit hole,

:

00:50:30,431 --> 00:50:33,911

but in eastern Kentucky, the people

of Eastern Kentucky, I love y'all.

:

00:50:33,911 --> 00:50:38,081

I know I need to do more of a deep dive

on the stuff I said I would before, but

:

00:50:38,111 --> 00:50:41,861

the exploitation of people going through

the court system with court ordered

:

00:50:41,861 --> 00:50:46,301

treatment, whether it be substance abuse

treatment, anger management, treatment,

:

00:50:46,301 --> 00:50:52,301

batters intervention, DUI classes, I

mean, you know how much it, how difficult

:

00:50:52,301 --> 00:50:56,831

it is to get a license with the state

to be able to teach the DUI class.

:

00:50:56,891 --> 00:50:59,261

And it's because there's so

much fucking money in it.

:

00:51:00,583 --> 00:51:00,733

Hugh: Yeah.

:

00:51:00,733 --> 00:51:01,753

That doesn't surprise me.

:

00:51:01,753 --> 00:51:05,413

My, my experience with it though

is that it's sort of similar

:

00:51:05,413 --> 00:51:07,003

to privatizing anything else.

:

00:51:07,003 --> 00:51:10,723

When the government has a purpose

for something and then they privatize

:

00:51:10,723 --> 00:51:12,793

it, the purpose then changes.

:

00:51:12,853 --> 00:51:18,953

If you have a private for-profit person

or organization providing a service, the

:

00:51:18,953 --> 00:51:20,783

goal is no longer to provide the service.

:

00:51:20,783 --> 00:51:21,318

The mm-hmm.

:

00:51:21,403 --> 00:51:22,433

Goal is to make money.

:

00:51:22,433 --> 00:51:26,963

So you're going to look for ways to

meet the bullet points of what you're,

:

00:51:26,993 --> 00:51:29,663

what what you're told you have to do

to get the money, and you're gonna

:

00:51:29,663 --> 00:51:33,173

look for ways to do it as quickly and

efficiently and as much of a you know,

:

00:51:33,173 --> 00:51:36,503

just crank people through the system

as possible and it loses its purpose.

:

00:51:36,503 --> 00:51:40,133

It's the same way when you privatize

jails, you start running into Yep.

:

00:51:40,133 --> 00:51:43,583

People starving , and nutrition

issues and every, you know,

:

00:51:43,583 --> 00:51:44,753

corners cut on everything else.

:

00:51:44,753 --> 00:51:48,323

It's, I, that's sort of how I

saw it, was that okay, this may

:

00:51:48,323 --> 00:51:49,493

have started from a good idea.

:

00:51:49,863 --> 00:51:52,023

But this is absolutely ineffectual.

:

00:51:52,293 --> 00:51:56,833

It's become an industry that I remember

at a time where the families in transition

:

00:51:56,833 --> 00:52:02,023

program, we were asking regularly

the judges to waive the program.

:

00:52:02,053 --> 00:52:02,293

Yes.

:

00:52:02,353 --> 00:52:06,733

And we would waive it where, let's say

your child was 17 and a half years old.

:

00:52:06,733 --> 00:52:08,503

The parties had been

separated for five years.

:

00:52:08,503 --> 00:52:12,313

They've been co-parenting very

well, but hadn't gotten around

:

00:52:12,313 --> 00:52:13,453

to finalizing the divorce.

:

00:52:13,453 --> 00:52:14,473

They have a Yep.

:

00:52:14,473 --> 00:52:17,263

An uncontested divorce where

they're not fighting about anything.

:

00:52:17,263 --> 00:52:20,443

They may be good friends, they may

still live in the same household,

:

00:52:20,863 --> 00:52:24,643

and you would ask to wave families in

transition because number one, by the

:

00:52:24,643 --> 00:52:26,683

time they get in, the kid's gonna be 18.

:

00:52:26,683 --> 00:52:27,673

It's not gonna matter.

:

00:52:27,733 --> 00:52:29,953

And they don't need it, or

they just don't need it.

:

00:52:30,133 --> 00:52:33,943

And so we had, for a long time it was

being allowed Uhhuh, it was no big deal.

:

00:52:33,943 --> 00:52:35,203

And it was a smart decision.

:

00:52:35,263 --> 00:52:35,383

Yep.

:

00:52:35,413 --> 00:52:36,553

Let's move these people through.

:

00:52:36,553 --> 00:52:37,123

Let's get it.

:

00:52:37,123 --> 00:52:40,123

We're not waiting for these certificates

for people who clearly know how to raise

:

00:52:40,123 --> 00:52:43,213

a successful child, but the providers.

:

00:52:43,288 --> 00:52:44,668

It got that changed.

:

00:52:44,668 --> 00:52:44,758

Yep.

:

00:52:44,878 --> 00:52:48,178

And made it to where you couldn't have

just complained so much because the

:

00:52:48,178 --> 00:52:52,798

revenue was less so, and everybody had

to go through it, no matter whether

:

00:52:52,798 --> 00:52:56,638

you needed it, whether it was a

total waste of time, all of a sudden

:

00:52:56,638 --> 00:52:57,868

you couldn't get out of it anymore.

:

00:52:57,958 --> 00:52:58,078

Yep.

:

00:52:58,078 --> 00:53:02,038

No matter what the circumstances, you

had to continue to attend because the

:

00:53:02,038 --> 00:53:04,798

providers got mad that less people

were coming through the system.

:

00:53:04,918 --> 00:53:05,158

Christine: Yep.

:

00:53:05,218 --> 00:53:09,111

And that goes to you letting

me say my favorite quote ever.

:

00:53:09,111 --> 00:53:12,501

The road to hell is paved

with good intentions.

:

00:53:12,921 --> 00:53:13,371

All right.

:

00:53:13,371 --> 00:53:15,861

Y'all judgy y.com.

:

00:53:16,131 --> 00:53:19,581

Remember, if you like what we're

doing, like share, subscribe,

:

00:53:19,641 --> 00:53:24,831

YouTube, Spotify, iHeartRadio, apple

Podcast, you name it, we're on it.

:

00:53:24,831 --> 00:53:29,301

I'm Kentucky Christine on

TikTok and Instagram, judge y.

:

00:53:29,301 --> 00:53:32,571

We appreciate y'all so,

so, so, so, so, so much.

:

00:53:32,871 --> 00:53:33,291

All right.

:

00:53:33,291 --> 00:53:33,651

Bye.

:

00:53:33,716 --> 00:53:34,066

Hugh: Peace.

:

00:53:44,388 --> 00:53:44,678

Yeah.

:

00:53:44,788 --> 00:53:45,078

Yeah.

:

00:53:46,543 --> 00:53:46,603

We

Listen for free

Show artwork for The JudgeMental Podcast

About the Podcast

The JudgeMental Podcast
From the Creators of Judge-y
The JudgeMental Podcast features two attorneys, Hugh and Christine, who bring over three decades of combined litigation experience to the mic. Now venturing into a bold new initiative—"Judge-y", a website and soon-to-be app—they aim to give lawyers and litigants a platform to evaluate judges and promote accountability within the judiciary.

About your host

Profile picture for Hugh Barrow

Hugh Barrow