Episode 75

full
Published on:

18th Mar 2026

EP 75 Idle Hands

EPISODE 75: IDLE HANDS

JudgeMental Podcast with Hugh and Christine

Welcome back to Season 2 of the JudgeMental Podcast! In this episode, hosts Hugh and Christine return from a brief hiatus to discuss major developments in family court transparency and the launch of their revolutionary judicial accountability app, Judgy.

IN THIS EPISODE:

Major Announcement: Judgy App Launch

Friday the 13th launch of Judgy - the app that empowers citizens to judge the judges

Available now on Google Play Store and Apple App Store

Visit judge-y.com to download and learn more

Follow @Judgingthejudges on social media for updates

Media Coverage & Public Discourse

Discussion of the Courier Journal op-ed "Family Courts Change Lives. Transparency is Essential" by Leanne Thompson

Analysis of why family court issues are finally getting mainstream media attention

The importance of transparency in judicial proceedings

Third-Party Appointments in Family Court

Deep dive into the problematic use of GALs (Guardians ad Litem) and Friends of the Court

How quasi-judicial immunity protects court-appointed officials

The financial burden of multiple third-party appointments on families

How these appointments can escalate conflict rather than resolve it

Systemic Issues in Family Court


Lack of checks and balances compared to criminal court

No jury trials in family court proceedings

Constitutional rights often overlooked in custody decisions

The devastating impact of lengthy appeals processes on families

The Appeals Problem

Why expedited cases still take 6-12 months minimum

How harmful orders remain in effect throughout the entire appeals process

The financial disparity between parties who can afford appeals vs. those who cannot

No public defender equivalent in family court

RESOURCES:

Download Judgy: judge-y.com

Follow on social media: @Judgingthejudges

Read the Courier Journal op-ed mentioned in this episode

HOSTS:

Hugh and Christine - Two attorneys determined to bring accountability and transparency to the court system


LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Engaging with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the hosts, guests, or their firms. The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are solely those of the individuals involved and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any law firm, company, or organization. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the information presented. Any reliance on the information in this podcast is at your own risk. Laws are constantly changing, and every situation is unique. You should always seek the advice of a qualified attorney for your specific legal concerns.

Listen for free

Show artwork for The JudgeMental Podcast

About the Podcast

The JudgeMental Podcast
From the Creators of Judge-y
The JudgeMental Podcast features two attorneys, Hugh and Christine, who bring over three decades of combined litigation experience to the mic. Now venturing into a bold new initiative—"Judge-y", a website and soon-to-be app—they aim to give lawyers and litigants a platform to evaluate judges and promote accountability within the judiciary.

About your host

Profile picture for Hugh Barrow

Hugh Barrow